Why India Is Not Intervening in the Recent Crisis in Maldives

The recent crisis in the Maldives has raised questions about India's role and involvement. It is important to understand the dynamics behind India's decision not to intervene.

Why Would India Want to Do That?

India, as a regional and global power, has a significant geopolitical influence in the Indian Ocean. However, India's decision to refrain from intervening in the Maldives crisis is more nuanced and multifaceted than it might initially appear.

The current situation reminds us of the 1988 operation known as Operation Cactus, where India intervened to restore political stability in the Maldives. However, this historical intervention is no longer the norm in today's global landscape. The world has changed, and the principles governing international relations have evolved.

Geopolitical Changes and National Sovereignty

One of the key changes in international politics is the shift from a Cold War era where states intervened based on political and ideological alignments. Today, the global order is defined by a liberal international system, where each nation-state is expected to respect the sovereignty and internal affairs of others.

Every country, either large or small, is striving for national identity and independence, often at the expense of former alliances or dependencies. Maldives' call for internal stability and preservation of its democratic processes is a manifestation of this trend. It is a sovereign nation, and its domestic policies, including any potential internal issues, are a matter for its citizens and governing bodies to address.

India's Caution and Neighboring Relations

India's decision to refrain from intervention must also be understood within the context of its relationships with its neighboring countries. The recent history of strained relations, particularly with Nepal and Bhutan, serves as a cautionary tale. These countries have shown a significant level of resistance against perceived Indian interference in their internal affairs. This has led to a general awareness in India that intervention must be carefully considered and justified.

India's current stance reflects a balance between its national interests and the complex geopolitical realities of the region. While India is willing to help and support neighboring countries, it will do so only through external authorities or when directly requested by the countries themselves.

Conclusion and FutureOutlook

The decision of India not to intervene in the Maldives crisis is a consequence of evolving international norms and the delicate balance of power in the region. As India navigates its role in South Asian and broader geopolitics, it must carefully weigh its actions and decisions to avoid unwanted conflicts or misunderstandings.

For now, India will continue to support the Maldives and other neighboring countries through diplomatic channels and humanitarian aid. However, any significant military or political intervention will likely be seen as a step too far, absent explicit requests or urgent international reasons.

Key Points to Remember:

Sovereign nations have the right to determine their internal affairs. India's intervention in the past was a response to a specific historical context, which no longer prevails today. India must carefully navigate its external policies to maintain good relations with its neighbors.

For more detailed information, please refer to the following sources:

Operation Cactus in 1988