The Complexities of Implementing National Voting by Mail in the United States

The United States has long relied on state-level elections, with the presidential election serving as a merging point for 50 individual state processes. This fragmented approach raises questions about the feasibility and potential challenges of transitioning to a nationwide system of voting by mail. The reasons behind this system's persistence relate to concerns around voter fraud and the democratic processes that shape election laws.

The Challenges of National Voting Systems

One major obstacle to a universal voting system in the US is the significant room for fraud. While absentee voting by mail exists, it has its own set of potential vulnerabilities and logistical hurdles. The voter fraud risk is a primary concern for those responsible for maintaining the integrity of the electoral process. Additionally, the decentralized nature of the US political system, with each state having its own laws and jurisdictions, complicates efforts to implement a “universal” voting procedure.

The Democratic History of Voting in the US

Looking back at the history of voting rights, it's evident that the fight for democracy has been far from a straightforward process. In the early days of the US, the right to vote was narrowly defined, extending only to Anglo-Saxon men who owned property. This exclusionary approach was not due to a lack of concern for democracy but rather a desire to maintain rigid control over those who could participate in governance. The fact that voting rights were not a constitutional amendment highlights the pervasive issues of class and race that have historically influenced who holds power.

The corrupting influence of power has been evident throughout history, especially during periods of social change that threatened the existing order. For instance, attempts to broaden voting rights have often been met with resistance from those who benefit from the status quo. The idea of creating a more upwardly mobile society that values human life over maintaining control can be seen as a threat to the egos and status of certain groups. Evolutionary psychology provides insights into this phenomenon, suggesting that a primary driving force is the protection of in-group interests, often at the expense of the broader community.

Why the Status Quo Persists

While some argue that the current system is working well enough, others see it as a system that has glitches and unforeseen problems. Current laws and practices have evolved to favor certain outcomes, which is precisely why many states resist changes that could disrupt the status quo. Absentee voting by mail has proven effective, so the argument goes, why shake things up? Proposals for a universal voting system would introduce new vulnerabilities that could, in theory, be exploited by voter fraud.

Furthermore, the complexity of the US political system, involving 54 jurisdictions, means that any change requires extensive legislative effort and negotiation. Each state has its own interests and priorities, and the decision to change voting procedures is often driven by the desire to secure or maintain election results.

Conclusion

The question of why the US does not have a national voting by mail system is multi-faceted, encompassing concerns about fraud, historical voting rights, and the decentralized nature of the US political system. While there are valid arguments for maintaining the current system, it is essential to acknowledge the ongoing challenges and the need for continuous improvement in ensuring the integrity and accessibility of the electoral process.