Supporting Donald Trump: A Defiant Voice Against the Establishment

I do not support Donald Trump, but those who do unfortunately believe that the answer to economic hard times is to have a THUG in power. That is what happened in GERMANY of 1933.

A Lack of Moral Center

Supporting Trump signifies the absence of ethical principles, no standards for the education, intelligence, or behavior of the American head of state. It is unjustifiable to endorse or support him, as it indicates selfishness, malice, wilful ignorance, or sheer stupidity.

A Self-Righteous Stance

My disdain for him goes back nearly 30 years, and I will never support him. I cheer against the Patriots in the Super Bowl, against LeBron James in the NBA, and even hold Hillary Clinton in high regard. During the past two years, I have enjoyed every minute of what I see as a day-to-day spectacle orchestrated by Democrats.

Adverse Effects and Benefits

Supporting Donald Trump means:

Making fun of people of colour, women, disabled individuals, and veterans without fear of repercussions. Not feeling guilty about my lack of education. Keeping my unregistered guns. Not being afraid to say goodbye to my medical coverage, tax refunds, and assurances of basic necessities like food, water, and air quality. Being able to joke about the American flag being spat on my backpack.

Most importantly, I am proud that he allows a site like this for me to air my questions and opinions on. And I am proud that he values American security and has a more realistic approach to foreign threats.

Comparing Candidates

One candidate is not part of the mainstream Washington establishment. Their opponent represents crony politics and the continuation of the “gravy train” at the expense of American taxpayers. One candidate is not politically correct, while the other is the master of disguising their true sentiment and intentions.

One candidate seeks to “extreme vetting” to prevent terrorist attacks, while the other advocates for open borders, irrespective of potential nefarious intentions. One candidate aims to rebuild the military, while the other wants to gut it as Obama has done. One candidate wants better trade deals for the USA, while the other has already sold jobs and manufacturing to the highest bidder. One candidate respects US personnel overseas, while the other has proven to be incompetent, costing lives.

Ethical Concerns and Legal Repercussions

The chosen candidate has faced ethical challenges, including controversial business practices and legal violations. Their opponent has a history of destroying evidence, lying to Congress and the FBI, and circumventing the rule of law. Both candidates are the worst two in my six decades on this planet, and the election in 2016 might be the catalyst for change.

Conclusion

I proudly support Trump because I cannot have Hillary Clinton, who has sold out to Radical Islam and illegal immigrants who refuse to assimilate to our traditions and customs. The biggest factor in backing Trump is his stance on not wanting nuclear war with Russia, a concern that Hillary Clinton seems to have hinted at otherwise.

Who here doesn’t think she owes military favors from the brass that contributed to that Clinton Foundation, the biggest and most protected sham charity ever devised?