Why Certain European Cities Lack Appeal for Long-term Residence

After years of working, living, and traveling extensively throughout Europe, I have encountered a vast array of experiences, both positive and negative. Among the cities that I would not choose to live in, even if offered a million dollars a year, are London, Brussels, Zug, Switzerland, and Krakow. Let's explore the reasons behind these choices.

Moving On from London

London, a city renowned for its culture, history, and financial prowess, is, for me, a place to avoid. Though overvalued, overpriced, and at times quite unsafe, the exorbitant cost of living is the primary deterrent. Housing, both in quality and price, is far from what an ideal lifestyle should entail. The current system is clearly catering to an elite class while the majority of people struggle to make ends meet. Additionally, the omnipresence of bankers and the city's high cost of living render it unsuitable unless you're deeply invested in the financial sector.

The Challenges of Brussels

Brussels, the capital of the European Union, has an allure with its multilingual environment where Dutch and French are spoken. The city, however, is plagued by numerous traffic jams and areas in a state of decay. There are certainly beautiful and rich districts, but these are the exceptions rather than the rule. The city's embrace of modern, often over-the-top architecture, referred to as "Architectural Barbarianism," has led to significant damage to historical structures. Furthermore, urban planning issues persist, suggesting a disconnection between policy and practical needs. In Brussels, finding an ideal place to live is akin to searching for a needle in a haystack, and my quest to do so is fruitless.

Zug: The Pharmaceutical Hub

Zug, close to the economically vibrant city of Zurich, is highly regarded for its pharmaceutical industry. While this is undoubtedly an upside, it is also a double-edged sword. The city is so immersed in pharmaceuticals that it can feel isolating and monotonous, bordering on dull. The upside is that it is a center for anti-depressants, but this is a niche market. The lack of diverse activities and culture makes it an unattractive place to live for those seeking a varied lifestyle.

Biarritz: The Beach-City Paradox

Return to nature or get ready to pursue survival. Biarritz, the picturesque coastal city in the French Basque Country, is a place that's entirely about the good life. If I were allowed to live there, my plan would be simple: be a tourist. However, the very things that make Biarritz appealing—beautiful beaches, surfing, and relaxing—make it challenging to generate a viable income. The lack of financial stability means that my dreams of living in Biarritz would become a reality if and only if I were content with being homeless.

Krakow: Air-Quality Woes

The historical beauty and vibrancy of Krakow, Poland's second-largest city, are overshadowed by persistent air pollution. Over a decade of living there, I noticed a significant improvement in my well-being back home, including better sleep and a more radiant appearance. The air quality issue is a pervasive problem, not just in Krakow but in many parts of Poland. The idea of subjecting myself to constant pollution is not appealing, making it a city I intend to avoid.

Choosing a city to live in is about more than just attractiveness and natural beauty. It's about finding a fulfilling and sustainable life that aligns with personal values and aspirations. For each of the cities mentioned, the challenges outweigh the advantages, making them non-ideal for long-term residence.