Understanding the Perception of Spain’s Stance on Israel’s Response to Arab Aggression

Recently, the perceived hostility of Spain towards Israel's response to the Hamas attack has garnered significant attention. This article aims to provide clarity on the complexities surrounding this issue, debunking the claims of widespread antisemitism and highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of the region's history.

Opinion and Perception

Among the Spanish lawmakers, there are

m

individuals with varying opinions, including those that are viewed as antisemitic or those receiving financial support from Qatar. However, it is important to note that such views are not unique to Spain and have been observed in other countries, especially Israel.

The current stance of many Spaniards on this matter is not as uniformly hostile as it may seem. According to a survey conducted on September 30, 2024, a majority of 50.3% of Spaniards consider the Israeli response to the Hamas attack adequate. The remaining 49.3% view it unfavorably. While a minority of the Spanish central government disagrees, it is the widespread ignorance about the region's history that contributes to this divide.

History and Context

To truly understand these perceptions, it is essential to revisit key historical events and their implications. The state of Israel was formed in 1948, following the United Nations Partition Plan. Both the Israelis and Arabs had the opportunity to create new states, but the Arabs chose to reject this option, demanding all territory instead of accepting a shared state.

It is often overlooked that the Jews in the region were already purchasing lands from the Ottoman Empire and later from the British protectorate, who were the legal owners at the time. Arabs and Jews coexisted in the same lands, paving the way for a diverse and complex social landscape.

The 1948 War saw Israel establish its state, a process beset by intense Arab opposition. Arabs had the chance to claim territories for their own states but ultimately chose to reject any division. During this conflict, both Arabs and Jews coexisted within the newly formed state.

When faced with the invasion by five Arab countries aiming to expel the Israelis, the state of Israel had no choice but to defend itself. This led to the displacement of some Arabs who fled during the conflict. Meanwhile, the state of Israel experienced a significant influx of refugees from Arab countries, which inadvertently strengthened the young nation.

In the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel again had to defend itself against multiple Arab nations. Following this, Israel took possession of additional lands that were initially allocated to Arabs. Similar patterns of conflict occurred in 1973, reinforcing the necessity for Israel to protect its territory.

The subsequent peace agreements, such as the Camp David Accord in 1978, were signed with Israel and several Arab countries. Despite these agreements, Palestinians found themselves expelled from various Arab states and did not regain access to them.

The Oslo Accords marked another try at the two-state solution, with Israel withdrawing from parts of Gaza and the West Bank. The Palestinians, however, chose to use the infrastructure and resources provided to them for the purpose of fulfilling their radical agenda, rather than creating a peaceful and prosperous nation.

Constantly faced with terrorist attacks and missile launches from Hamas and Hizbullah, the Israeli government was driven to respond to what it perceived as existential threats. The events of 7 October 2023 were the culmination of a series of such incidents, ultimately triggering a more decisive response.

Education and Awareness

The issue at hand is multifaceted, and the lack of education on the region’s history contributes significantly to the prevailing misconceptions. Schools in Spain and many other countries do not adequately cover the historical context, leaving students and the public with fragmented and incomplete narratives.

There is a need for a more comprehensive and objective approach to teaching about the Middle East, focusing on the region’s complex history and the international laws that govern the situation. Understanding these elements can help foster a more informed and nuanced public opinion.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the perception of Spain’s perceived hostility towards Israel’s response to Arab aggression is a result of historical ignorance and oversimplified narratives. By delving into the historical context and the broader implications of the Arab-Israeli conflict, we can better understand the complexities and nuances of this global issue.

The true international law does not support the notion that opposing Israel’s actions equates to being anti-Israel. Rather, it advocates for a balanced approach to resolving the conflict based on historical facts and the rule of law.