Donald Trump’s Criticism of Parasite: A Hater’s Revenge or Desperation?
Donald Trump’s Criticism of Parasite: A Hater’s Revenge or Desperation?
Donald Trump's recent dismissive comments about the critically acclaimed film Parasite, which won the Academy Award for Best Picture, have sparked renewed debate about the intersection of politics and cinema. Trump was particularly scathing about the Korean film, a move that some interpret as a backlash against the success of a film that broke Hollywood's historical dominance in the Oscar category.
The Intersection of Language and Film
Let’s be frank—Donald Trump, like many Americans, struggles with comprehending non-English subtitled films. His difficulty in grasping the plot and nuances of a language he doesn’t understand is unsurprising. This reality highlights how crucial language is in the appreciation and interpretation of film. In the case of Parasite, the film's power lies in its storytelling, which transcends language barriers with its universal themes and relatable characters.
Historical Context and Oscar Success
The success of Parasite over other films, including the highly acclaimed Shakespeare in Love, which won over Saving Private Ryan in terms of Oscars, is not without its historical context. The Academy Awards have often been criticized for a lack of diversity and inclusions, with the likes of Shakespeare in Love winning despite being criticized for its romanticized depiction of Shakespeare and its lack of authenticity. Paradoxically, Parasite offers a profound commentary on wealth, class, and power, themes that are universally resonant.
The Legacy of Parasite
While a few individuals may attempt to diminish the legacy of Parasite by ridiculing it, its place in cinema history is irrefutable. Reflecting on the success of the films from 2019, Parasite stands out as one of the most consequential releases of the year. The movie's impact on the global film industry and its ability to resonate with audiences cannot be overlooked.
Gone with the Wind: A Symbol of Racism and Inaccuracy
Donald Trump's nostalgic references to films like Gone with the Wind expose a troubling aspect of his worldview. Gone with the Wind, set in the American South during the Civil War, romanticizes a racially divided society where women have no rights and minorities are treated as second-class citizens. Trump's support for such ideals is deeply concerning, especially given the film's historical inaccuracy.
The movie's depiction of Rhett Butler as a man who rapes Scarlett O'Hara is a particularly disturbing aspect. The forced sexual encounter, where Rhett specializes in grabbing Scarlett by the 'puce,' goes beyond the boundaries of appropriate and respectful filmmaking. Such unsavory behaviors perpetuate harmful stereotypes and validate Trump's nostalgia for a society that lacks empathy and respect for marginalized groups.
Classical Hollywood and Nostalgia
Trump’s longing for Hollywood classics from the 1930s also reveals a poorly informed perspective on the film industry. The phrase "in his mind" refers to his desire for films like Home Alone II, where he appeared in a cameo role and for which he believes the Oscar would have been more appropriate. This desire for recognition through association highlights a shallow understanding of the film industry’s merit and values.
Ultimately, his criticism of Parasite reveals both a lack of understanding of the film itself and a cynical attempt to paint himself as a defender of traditional American values. In reality, his nostalgia for an era marked by racial division and gender inequality is, at best, misguided and, at worst, dangerous.
It is crucial to approach discussions about film, especially those held by public figures, with a dose of critical thinking. Parasite stands as a testament to the power of storytelling and its ability to challenge societal norms and inspire conversation.